Legal Opinion

Lilley v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided July 15, 2008No. Civil Action H-07-2117PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND OPINION

LEE H. ROSENTHAL, District Judge.

Home Depot asks this court to exclude the testimony of Dr. David E. Tomaszek, a neurosurgeon who performed back surgery on the plaintiff and who is designated as a testifying expert under Rule 26(b). The plaintiff, Bennie Lilley, alleges that he suffered extensive back injuries as a result of an incident at a Home Depot store. Home Depot argues that Dr. Tomaszek’s opinion that Lilley’s back injuries were caused by that incident should be excluded under Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence.

Based on the motion, response, the record,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Moore v. Ashland Chemical Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  4. Westberry v. Gislaved Gummi ABCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  5. Jules R. Viterbo, Et Ux, (Patricia Viterbo) v. The Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Adams v. Louisiana Department of CorrectionsDistrict Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2025
  2. Lyna Strong v. Raymond Paradise and Greyhound Lines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2025
  3. Sergio Alpizar v. John Christner Trucking, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2021
  4. Valaris plcUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API