Legal Opinion
Cameron v. Bay Mills Indian Community
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided January 25, 1994No. 2:93-cv-00200PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
QUIST, District Judge.
Plaintiff Carl Cameron is a Native American and a member of the Bay Mills Indian Community. His Complaint alleges that defendants Bay Mills Indian Community, Inc. and Jeff Parker, L. John Lufkins, Julie Timmer, Michael Parish and Deborah Walden, members of the Bay Mills Tribe Executive Counsel, wrongfully discharged him from his position as lieutenant with the Bay Mills Tribal Police Department. Defendants responded with a motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment, on the grounds that this Court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Citizen Band of Potawatomi Tribe of Okla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Dewitt Dillon, Cross-Appellants v. The State of Montana, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Quinault Tribe of Indians v. GallagherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Smith v. BabbittDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1995
- Davids v. CoyhisDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1994
- South Fork Band of the Te-Moak Tribe v. State Engineer of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2002
- Cutler v. DzingleLittle Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians Tribal Appellate Court · 2011