In re Silkman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Original proceedings for the suspension or disbarment of Theodore H. Silkman, as attorney and counselor at law. On return to an order to show cause. Motion for suspension denied.
1Opinion of the CourtHirschberg, J.
This proceeding was instituted by Mr. James M. Hunt, an attorney and counselor of the Supreme Court, by the presentation of verified charges against the Hon. Theodore H. Silk-man, surrogate of the county of Westchester,' accusing him, in the precise language of the charges, of “practicing as an attorney and counselor at law in the Supreme Court, Westchester county, and before this Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, said Supreme Court being- a court of record of. this state, in violation of the provisions of section 20 of article 6 of the Constitution of this state, and in violation of…
2Cited by11 opinions
- State Bar of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- In re StolenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- In Re Investigation of Circuit JudgeSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- In Re JonesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
- In Re the Disbarment of SpriggsArizona Supreme Court · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.