Legal Opinion
Balogh v. Ladanye
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 18, 1960PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
59 N.J. Super. 132 (1960)
157 A.2d 350
MARY BALOGH, INDIVIDUALLY AND MARY BALOGH, AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM OF GUSTAV BALOGH, AN INFANT, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
THOMAS LADANYE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 12, 1960.
Decided January 18, 1960.
Before Judges GAULKIN, SULLIVAN and FOLEY.
Mr. William K. Miller argued the cause for the defendant-respondent.
Mr. Oliver R. Kovacs argued the cause for the plaintiffs-appellants (Messrs. Clausen, Klein, Kovacs & Anderson, attorneys).
2Per curiam
The parties agree that Gustav Balogh was an infant under the age of 18 years…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Danek v. HommerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Damato v. DeluciaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- Watson v. StaggSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
- HOULIHAN EX REL. HOULIHAN v. RaymondNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Goetaski v. California Packing Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
4Cited by7 opinions
- Chickachop v. Manpower, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- Seltzer v. IsaacsonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Pappano v. Shop Rite of Pennington, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- Pratts v. Tribunal SuperiorSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1969
- Jensen v. Sport Bowl, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.