Legal Opinion · Dissent

Shin v. Ahn

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 21, 2006No. B184638Published

1Dissent

I respectfully dissent. The order granting a new trial should be reversed, and the grant of summary judgment reinstated, because this is a classic case of primary assumption of the risk, not secondary assumption of the risk. "The existence of `"`[d]uty' is not an immutable fact of nature `"but only an expression of the sum total of those considerations of policy which lead the law to say that the particular plaintiff is entitled to protection."'"' [Citation.]" (Avila v. Citrus CommunityCollege Dist. (2006) 38 Cal.4th 148, 160-161 [41 Cal.Rptr.3d 299, 131 P.3d 383] (Avila).) "Primary…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Knight v. JewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Avila v. Citrus Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Morgan v. Fuji Country USA, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Yancey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API