Legal Opinion

Arthur D. Little, Inc. v. Wellington Service Corp.

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided January 12, 1968No. #6606; #1574PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

This remand case is an action of contract in which the plaintiff seeks to recover from the two defendants property for damage to its goods alleged to have occurred in transit. The answer of both defendants included a general denial, statute of limitations, assumption of the risk, contributory negligence, failure to comply with the contract of carriage, failure to notify the defendants of the damage and intervention of the negligence of a third person.

The court found for the defendants.

The plaintiff seasonably filed several requests for rulings of law including the following:(4) The evidence…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brodeur v. SeymourMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  2. Fibre Leather Mfg. Corp. v. Ramsay Mills, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  3. Peck v. GreigeMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1961

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Photiou v. Del SordoMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1982
  2. New England Rehabilitation Hospital, Inc. v. HorganMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1980
  3. Reynolds Aluminum Building Products Co. v. LeonardMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1984
  4. Lavoie v. Empire Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API