In Re Mills
Supreme Court of the United States
ORIGINAL. . Habeas corpus. On the 4th of November, 1889, Mr. Van H. Manning presented a petition for the writ. Leave was granted,' November 11th, and a rule to show cause issued, returnable on the first Monday of December then next. Eeturn was made, and on the 5th of December leave was granted to proceed in forma pauperis, and on the 3d of April the petition for the writ was filed and submitted.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan
' ■ This is an original application to this court for a writ of habeas corpus. ■ Leave to file the petition having been given, a rule was granted against the warden of the State Penitentiary at Columbus, Ohio,.in which the petitioner was imprisoned, requiring;him to show cause why the writ should not be issued. The return to that rule shows that the petitioner was received, by the respondent, August 1, 1889, from the marshal of the United States for the Western District of Arkansas, pursuant to a judgment of the District Court of. the United States for that district, sentencing the prisoner…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Ex Parte RoyallSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Ex Parte VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- NielsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by129 opinions
- Weems v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- In Re BonnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- United States v. PridgeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Stephens v. Cherokee NationSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Egan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
124 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.