Legal Opinion

Schock v. Ocker Insurance Corp.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1976No. Civ. 9208PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEDERSON, Justice.

This appeal by Pilgrim Life Insurance Company is from a judgment, from an or der denying a Rule 52(b) motion to amend the findings and the judgment, and from an order denying a Rule 59 motion for a new trial. This case raises for the first time in this State the question of whether knowledge of a medical history (other than knowledge of impending death) by agents or brokers must be communicated to the insurer in a credit life insurance transaction when there is apparently no statement of physical condition required.

Emilie Schock, as administratrix of the estate of Leo…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. HaakensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  2. DeForest v. DeForestNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Eakman v. RobbNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Ellendale Farmers Union Cooperative Ass'n v. DavisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Jahner v. JacobNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Quinlivan v. Emcasco Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Missouri Valley Perforating, Inc. v. McDonald Investment Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Woods Farmers Cooperative Elevator Co. v. Z-Mega Farms Ltd. Partnership ICourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  4. Fortman v. MantheyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Fortman v. MantheyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API