Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fortman v. Manthey

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1976No. Civ. 9241Published

1DissentPederson, Justice

When a case which has been tried to a court without a jury is appealed to this Court, the appellant can claim that either (1) one or more of the findings of fact are clearly erroneous [Rule 52a, N.D.R.Civ.P.], or (2) the trial court erroneously applied the law.

Although a motion to amend the findings under Rule 52(b), N.D.R.Civ.P., is not a prerequisite to appellate review [5A Moore’s Federal Practice, ¶ 52.11(4)] and the burden is not on the appellant to request specific findings [Finney v. Arkansas Board of Correction, 505 F.2d 194 (8th Cir. 1974)], there are contrary holdings and many…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Finney v. Arkansas Board of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  2. Jay F. Swanson v. Stan LevyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  3. Ellendale Farmers Union Cooperative Ass'n v. DavisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Jahner v. JacobNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Schock v. Ocker Insurance Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API