Legal Opinion
SIEGEL v. GOLDSTEIN
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 21, 2023No. 2:19-cv-02890Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PHILIP T. SIEGEL, DDS, CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, v. MARK GOLDSTEIN, BRIAN SMITH, NO. 19-2890 JOSEPH MULLIGAN, SAMER ABDELSAMIE AND DELAWARE VALLEY MAXILLOFACIAL AND ORAL SURGERY, P.C. , Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Philip Siegel, a retired dentist, has sued his former dental practice and its shareholders—Mark Goldstein, Brian Smith, Joseph Mulligan, and Samer Abdelsamie—seeking relief in connection with their cancellation of his shares. Plaintiff and Defendants have filed cross-motions for summary judgment…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- John Doe v. University of the SciencesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Suppan v. DadonnaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.