Legal Opinion

State v. Upton

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1946No. 963PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STANFORD, Chief Justice.

Before we offer the statement of facts it is proper that we state that counsel who appeared in this court to assist this appel lant did not represent defendant in the trial court.

The appellant herein, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged in the superior court with the crime of statutory-rape, a felony, upon a girl fifteen years of age. Defendant pleaded not guilty to the charge. A jury returned a verdict of guilty. Thereafter defendant’s motion for new trial to set aside the verdict was denied.

The act complained of was claimed to have been committed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Glendale v. CoquatArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Town of South Tucson v. Board of SupervisorsArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  3. State of Arizona v. PollockArizona Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Reidhead v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Guldin v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. PolanArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  2. State v. RileySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  3. State v. MillsArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  4. State v. HoffmanArizona Supreme Court · 1955
  5. United States v. HendersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API