Legal Opinion

State v. Jager

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1865PublishedCited by 16 opinions

CERTIFIED from the Circuit Court for Winnebago County. to tbe point that this was not a case in wbicli exceptions could be taken under see. 7, cb. 180, R. S., cited R. S., chap. 37; 11 N. H., 156; 12 id., 144; 6 Pick., 104 ; 6 Blackf, 4,5 ; 39 Me., 472.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Cole, J.

This is a bastardy case, which has been certified to this court on exceptions under section 7, chap. 180, R. S. The attorney general insists that the exceptions must be dismissed, for the reason that it is not a case in which exceptions could be taken under that section. We think this view of that section is correct, and that the objection must prevail.

It is provided in that section that any person who shall be convicted of an “offense” before the circuit court, being aggrieved by any opinion or direction of the court in any matter of law, may have his exceptions, &c.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Walker v. State ex rel. CorbinIndiana Supreme Court · 1841
  2. Duffies v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Mills v. GeerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Skaggs v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Baker v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Baker v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  5. President of Platteville v. McKernanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API