Commonwealth v. Doran
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Rhodes, J.,
Opinion by
The appellant, Mary Doran, contends that she has been improperly convicted of larceny.
The first count of the indictment on which she was tried charged “that Margaret Smozski and Mary Doran ...... with force and arms, the building of Gimbel Brothers, Incorporated,......feloniously and burglari-ously did wilfully and maliciously enter, with intent the goods, chattels, moneys and property of the said Gimbel Brothers in the said building then and there being, then and there feloniously and burglariously to steal, take and carry away, and [describing merchandise and the value…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CarsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Hollister v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
- Becker v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Commonwealth v. MeinhartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Commonwealth v. SuttonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Tyson v. DaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Commonwealth v. HellnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.