Legal Opinion
Rosberg v. Rosberg
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided June 1, 2021No. 8:21-cv-00152Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA PAUL A. ROSBERG, 8:21CV152 Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM vs. AND ORDER KELLY R. ROSBERG, STATE OF NEBRASKA, and JAMES KUBE, Defendants. Plaintiff, a non-prisoner, filed his pro se Complaint on April 15, 2021, and has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The court now conducts an initial review of Plaintiff’s Complaint (Filing 1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). I. APPLICABLE STANDARDS ON INITIAL REVIEW The court is required to review in forma pauperis complaints to determine whether summary dismissal is appropriate. The…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.