Legal Opinion

Horton v. 48th District Court

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided August 16, 2006No. CIV. 05-072356Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

FEIKENS, District Judge.

Plaintiff Michelle Horton brings this action against her former employer, the 48th District Court, and court administrator James Harkins, alleging wrongful discharge, violation of due process under 28 U.S.C. § 1983, and defamation. Defendants move for summary judgment on all counts, and for the reasons that follow, this Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants’ motion. 1

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

In 1990, Plaintiff began employment as a clerk at the 48th District Court in Bloomfield Hills. (PL’s Resp. 2.)…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API