Legal Opinion

Tait v. Wahl

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 1, 1999No. 42327-4-IPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKennedy, C.J.

After Mary Douglas was struck and killed by a delivery truck, Amber Tait, the decedent’s niece, sued the delivery truck’s owner and driver on behalf of herself, her children, the decedent’s nondependent brother, and the decedent’s estate, seeking damages for pain and suffering, medical and other out-of-pocket expenses, impairment of income and earning capacity, loss of enjoyment of life, and loss of consortium. Because Tait, her children, and the decedent’s nondependent brother are not beneficiaries under Washington’s wrongful death and survival statutes, RCW 4.20.010, .020, .046(1), .060,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. American Legion Post No. 32 v. City of Walla WallaWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Hedrick v. Ilwaco Railway & Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Wooldridge v. WoolettWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Lockhart v. BeselWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Armijo v. WesseliusWashington Supreme Court · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Philippides v. BernardWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Philippides v. BernardWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Choctaw Maid Farms, Inc. v. HaileyMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Woodall v. AVALON CARE CENTER-FEDERAL WAYCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  5. Schumacher v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API