Legal Opinion

People v. Pizzimenti

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1922No. Docket No. 157PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWlEST, J.

Defendant was convicted of receiving stolen property. Upon being asked by the court if he had anything to say before sentence he replied: “I do not know of anything.” He was thereupon sentenced to the Michigan reformatory. Two months later he moved, the court to set the sentence aside on the ground that it was excessive, because it was defendant’s first offense and he was given no opportunity to make a showing of restitution. When such motion was denied a motion for a new trial was made on the ground there was not sufficient testimony to warrant the conviction. No claim of restitution was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. People v. HubbardMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Good v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API