Legal Opinion
State v. Wilson
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided June 2, 1961No. FILE Nos. CR 15-158, CR 15-159PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
These cases are being considered together because they involve identical issues. Each defendant is engaged in the business of servicing television sets. Each defendant has been charged with obtaining money by false pretenses in violation of General Statutes § 53-360, and specifically with charging and receiving payment for television repairs not actually performed or needed.
The defendants were arraigned before the Circuit Court in the fifteenth circuit, sitting in New Britain. After separate hearings, the trial court found probable cause in each case and bound each defendant over to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Marcil v. A. H. Merriman & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
- Gores v. RosenthalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Northeastern Gas Transmission Co. v. BrushSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- State v. FoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Waterbury Blank Book Manufacturing Co. v. HurlburtSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Thomas C. Cooper, Relator-Appellant v. Frederick G. ReinckeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
- Brisson v. Warden of Connecticut State PrisonConnecticut Superior Court · 1964
- State v. DionneConnecticut Superior Court · 1962
- Stroman v. GilbertConnecticut Appellate Court · 1963
- State v. BowlingConnecticut Appellate Court · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.