Legal Opinion
Mead Johnson & Company v. Baby's Formula Service, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided October 10, 1968No. 25241_1PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, Circuit Judge:
This case presents the unusual situation of the successful plaintiff in the trial court appealing here because it did not receive all the relief to which it felt entitled. It is a trademark infringement case which resulted in a finding by the trial court of infringement by the appellee Baby’s Formula Service, Inc., of Mead-Johnson’s trademark ENFAMIL, and in which the court enjoined further infringement but dismissed all proceedings against the individual defendants, officers or employees of the company, and denied all accounting for damages resulting from the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. Du Bois Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
- Ambrosia Chocolate Co. v. Ambrosia Cake Bakery, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
3Cited by50 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. MasonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Donsco, Inc. v. Casper Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Engineering Dynamics, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Structural Software, Inc., and S. Rao Guntur, Defendants-Appellees-Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Oriental Financial Group, Inc. v. Cooperativa De Ahorro Y Crédito OrientalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. YakubetsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.