Legal Opinion
Suster v. Marshall
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided July 30, 1998No. Nos. 96-4048, 96-4115, 96-4287, 96-4380 and 97-3174PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KEITH, Circuit Judge.
Defendants-Appellants appeal the district court’s grant of preliminary injunction, enjoining the enforcement of Canon VII(C)(6) of the Ohio Code of Judicial Conduct. Plaintiffs-Appellees, Suster and Clearly, cross-appeal the district court’s denial of preliminary injunction to enjoin enforcement of Canon VII(C)(8) of the Ohio Judicial Code of Conduct. For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the decision of the district court.
I. Factual Background
Plaintiffs are judges on the Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court. Judge Ronald Suster (“Suster”) was appointed to the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Osterberg v. PecaTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Sammartano v. First Judicial District Court, in and for the County of Carson CityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
- Bovee v. Coopers & Lybrand C.P.A.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Mario Rosales-Garcia v. J.T. Holland, Warden, Reynero Arteaga Carballo v. Mark Luttrell, Warden Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Coalition for Government Procurement v. Federal Prison Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.