Legal Opinion

Allstate Insurance v. Stamp

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 22, 1991No. 89-349PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

This declaratory judgment proceeding arose from an underlying tort action in which Hopkinton police officer Ira Migdal and his wife alleged that the minor defendant Bobby Stamp shot Officer Migdal in the leg, causing him serious bodily injury and his wife loss of consortium, and that the defendants Walter and Carol Stamp, Bobby’s parents, also caused these injuries by negligently supervising Bobby. The plaintiff in this proceeding, Allstate Insurance Company, obtained a declaratory judgment from the Superior Court (Mohl, J.) that, with respect to the Migdals’ allegations in the underlying…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Daigle v. City of PortsmouthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Johnson Shoes, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  3. Pawtucket Mutual Insurance v. LebrechtSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1963
  4. Robbins Auto Parts, Inc. v. Granite State InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  5. Travelers Ins. Co. v. BlanchardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Texas Farmers Insurance Co. v. MurphyTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Patel v. NJ MOTOR VEHICLE COM'NSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
  3. Providence Mutual Fire Insurance v. ScanlonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  4. Johnson v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
  5. Villa v. ShortSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API