Idaho Falls Redevelopment Agency v. Countryman

794 P.2d 632 (1990)

118 Idaho 43

IDAHO FALLS REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, Petitioner,

v.

James COUNTRYMAN and Richard Hale, Respondents.

No. 18239.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

July 3, 1990.

Elam, Burke & Boyd, Boise, for petitioner. Ryan P. Armbruster argued.

Anderson, Pike & Bush, Idaho Falls, for respondents. Dale W. Storer argued.

BOYLE, Justice.

In this original proceeding we are called upon to determine whether sufficient reasons and extraordinary conditions exist to warrant issuance of a writ of mandamus.[1]

The city of Idaho Falls established the Idaho Falls Redevelopment Agency (hereinafter "Agency")…