Legal Opinion
Bain v. Hofmann
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided February 22, 2010No. 09-262PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1. Plaintiff appeals pro se from the dismissal of his complaint on res judicata grounds. We affirm.
¶ 2. Plaintiff is an inmate in the custody and control of the Vermont Department of Corrections (DOC). Plaintiff filed a pro se complaint against the DOC Commissioner in September 2008 and filed an amended complaint in March 2009. He alleged, in relevant part, that he was being denied adequate medical care in violation of his rights. He sought injunctive relief — specifically, an order directing DOC to treat his medical problems consistent with “prevailing medical standards.” The State moved…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bull v. Pinkham Engineering Assocs., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- In Re Central Vermont Public Service CorporationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
- Berlin Convalescent Center, Inc. v. StonemanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
- Lamb v. GeovjianSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- Faulkner v. Caledonia County Fair Ass'nSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- John Moyers v. Sheun Lai Poon and Brenda Lee PoonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- Boule v. MenardVermont Superior Court · 2018
- Brandt v. PallitoVermont Superior Court · 2017
- Dasler v. WashburnVermont Superior Court · 2025
- In re Richard LawsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.