Legal Opinion

In re Richard Laws

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 12, 2013No. 2013-022Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Note: Decisions of a three-justice panel are not to be considered as precedent before any tribunal. ENTRY ORDER SUPREME COURT DOCKET NO. 2013-022 JUNE TERM, 2013 In re Richard Laws } APPEALED FROM: } } Superior Court, Washington Unit, } Civil Division } } DOCKET NO. 566-8-12 Wncv Trial Judge: Robert R. Bent In the above-entitled cause, the Clerk will enter: Petitioner appeals the superior court’s order granting the State’s motion to dismiss his third post-conviction-relief (PCR) petition as successive. We affirm. In 1993, petitioner was sentenced to twenty to twenty-five years to serve after…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Darrell Keith Rich v. Arthur Calderon, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. In Re LawsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
  4. Bain v. HofmannSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API