Legal Opinion

City of Oakland v. Moore

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 10, 1969PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoley, J.

The- defendant was convicted under OBS 482.650 of driving while his right to apply for a driver’s license was suspended. The proceeding was based on a uniform traffic -citation on which the pertinent charging part consisted of checks in the following squares:

“[V] No license □ Vehicle [V] Operator □ Expired [V] Suspended”

The defendant claims that the citation charges only driving while license is suspended and is insufficient to support a conviction of driving during the suspension of his right to apply for a license.

ORS 482.650 provides:

“No person whose operator’s * * * license, or whose…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State of Oregon v. CahillOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  2. State v. WaggonerOregon Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. LLOYD A. FRY ROOFING COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  2. State v. MarksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. City of Oakland v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1969
  4. State v. DenueCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  5. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API