Legal Opinion

Crossmann Communities of North Carolina, Inc. v. Harleysville Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 28, 2015No. Appellate Case No. 2012-213245; No. 5292PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShort, J.

In this insurance dispute, Crossmann Communities of North Carolina, Inc. (Crossmann) and Beazer Homes Investment Corp. (Beazer) (collectively, Appellants) appeal the trial court’s order finding Cincinnati Insurance Company (Cincinnati) has no obligation to Appellants for costs incurred by Beazer to repair property damage at several condominium projects. Appellants argue the trial court erred in (1) determining commercial general liability (CGL) insurance policies underlying Cincinnati’s umbrella policies were not exhausted and (2) finding Cincinnati was not bound by a 2007 judgment. We affirm.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Crossmann Communities of North Carolina, Inc. v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  3. Benjamin Moore & Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
  4. Transportation Insurance v. South Carolina Second Injury FundSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  5. Buckner v. Preferred Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Peter D. Protopapas v. Travelers CasualtyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2025
  2. Portrait Homes v. Pennsylvania National MutualCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API