Department of Revenue v. Bailey-Bohrman Steel Corp.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.
The only question on this appeal is whether the Bailey-Bohrman Steel Corporation was engaged in manufacturing as defined in sec. 77.51(27), Stats., and is therefore exempt from use taxes under the provisions of sec. 77.54(6) (a). We conclude that, under these statutes and in light of the undisputed facts, the machinery used by the taxpayer, Bailey-Bohrman Steel Corporation, was exempt from the Wisconsin use tax. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the trial court.
This litigation arises out of an assessment of use taxes levied upon the taxpayer for the period commencing on December 1,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- St. Luke's Hospital Ass'n v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Engineers & Scientists of Milwaukee, Inc. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Ramrod, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- H. Samuels Co. v. Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Department of Revenue v. Sterling Custom Homes Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. EichmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
- Lincoln Savings Bank, S.A. v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
- Midcontinent Broadcasting Co. of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Pabst Brewing Co. v. City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
- Xerox Corp. v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.