Mickle v. Sanchez
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the superior court of the city of San Francisco. A demurrer was filed to the complaint, and the cause was heard and decided in the superior court upon the demurrer, and judgment rendered thereon in favor of the plaintiffs. The case, without the formality of a regular appeal, was submitted to this court by stipulation of the respective attorneys, under the agreement that the decision of the court upon the question presented by the demurrer should be final.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Bennett, J.
The papers show that one Maiben of Valparaiso was indebted to the plaintiffs, a firm doing business at San Francisco under the name of E. Mickle & Co. in the sum of |300Q for commissions, and to the firm of Mickle & *201Co. of Valparaiso, the correspondents of the plaintiffs, in the further sum of $6000. The plaintiffs had, in their hands, goods consigned to them by Maiben of the value of $5514,50, at the market value, over and above all probable charges and commissions thereon. To secure the indebtedness of $6000 to the house of Mickle & Co. of Valparaiso, one Bernardino…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Retsloff v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Welch v. British American Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1905
- Braly v. ReeseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
- American Center for Education, Inc. v. CavnarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Stockton Savings Bank v. McCownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.