Legal Opinion

Shamrock Holdings, Inc. v. Polaroid Corp.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided March 20, 1989No. Civ. A. 89-93-CMWPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CALEB M. WRIGHT, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiffs Shamrock Holdings, Inc., Shamrock Holdings of California, Inc., Shamrock Capital Investors III, Inc., Emerald Isle Associates, L.P. and Shamrock Acquisition III, Inc. (collectively “Shamrock”) brought this action for injunctive relief on March 1, 1989, against defendant Polaroid Corporation (“Polaroid”). 1 This action is the latest eddy in what has become a maelstrom of litigation surrounding Shamrock’s unwelcome effort to acquire Polaroid.

Shamrock seeks preliminary and permanent injunctive relief against the cash self-tender offer for…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Warner Communications, Inc. v. MurdochDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1984
  3. Polaroid Corp. v. DisneyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  4. Chromalloy American Corp. v. Sun Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  5. Radol v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Tracinda Corp. v. DAIMLERCHRYSLER AGDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2002
  2. Taniguchi v. Association of Apartment Owners of King Manor, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Krauth v. Executive Telecard, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  4. Alizac Partners v. Rospatch Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1989
  5. Taniguchi v. ASSOCIATION OF KING MANORHawaii Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API