Legal Opinion
Polaroid Corp. v. Disney
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 23, 1988No. 88-3676PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BECKER, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal by Polaroid Corporation (“Polaroid”) from an order of the district court denying Polaroid’s motion for a preliminary injunction against a tender offer for Polaroid stock which, if successful, would vest control of Polaroid in interests controlled by appellees Roy and Patricia Disney. The appeal presents the first impression question of the standing of a target company to assert a violation of the Security and Exchange Commission’s All Holders Rule, 17 C.F.R. § 240.14d-10(a) (1987). It also raises the question whether *990the Disney…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Retired Chicago Police Ass'n v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Keepers, Inc. v. City of MilfordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Tenafly Eruv Ass'n v. Borough of TenaflyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Three Rivers Center For Independent Living, Inc. v. Housing Authority Of The City Of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Amato v. WilentzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.