Legal Opinion

Klinefelter v. Dutch

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided February 21, 1991No. 90-1583-FTPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDykman, J.

Charles and Kathleen Stock appeal from a judgment of adverse possession awarding a portion of their real estate to Raymond and Eleanor Klinefelter. The issue is whether, pursuant to sec. 893.25, Stats., the Klinefelters had "occupied" the disputed parcel of wooded land and "[protected it by a substantial enclosure." We conclude they did and therefore affirm that portion of the trial court's judgment. We reverse, however, that portion of the judgment awarding the Klinefelters their actual attorney fees.

I. BACKGROUND

The Klinefelters and the Stocks own adjacent forty acre parcels in Juneau…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Watkins v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Illinois Steel Co. v. BilotWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  3. State v. ShafferCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
  4. Worthley v. BurbanksIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Sauers v. GiddingsMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lewis v. MoorheadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. STEUCK LIVING TRUST v. EasleyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010
  3. Juul v. ZemanCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2019
  4. Lewis v. MoorheadSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Luzier v. HemmahSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API