Nashid v. State

Phipps, Judge.

A jury found John Renard Nashid guilty of armed robbery, kidnapping, aggravated assault, and possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime. He appeals, arguing that the trial court erred by (1) admitting evidence of another crime that was not sufficiently similar to the charged crimes and (2) failing to redact from his taped conversations with the police statements that reflected poorly on his character. We find no error and affirm.

On appeal from a criminal conviction, the defendant no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence, and we view the evidence in the light…