Legal Opinion
DHX, Inc. v. Allianz AGF MAT, Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 19, 2005No. 03-55426, 03-55455PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The parties have informed the court that they have settled the economic issues in this case. Because the parties have agreed in open court on appeal that there are no objections to vacating the district court’s October 17, 2002 order denying the motion to dismiss for improper venue,1 we *1170remand for a determination by the district court whether that order, the summary judgment order, and/or the judgment entered on February 18, 2003, should be vacated. See U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall P’ship, 513 U.S. 18, 29, 115 S.Ct. 386, 130 L.Ed.2d 233 (1994) (holding that “mootness by…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- American Games, Inc., Intervenor-Appellant v. Trade Products, Inc., and Stuart Entertainment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
3Cited by20 opinions
- Pitts v. Terrible Herbst, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Schneider v. ChertoffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Lowery v. Channel Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Rabinovitz v. City of L. A.District Court, C.D. California · 2018
- Schneider v. ChertoffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.