Legal Opinion

People v. Huizenga

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided May 1, 1989No. Docket 105446PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurphy, J.

Defendant appeals as of right from his plea-based conviction for carrying a concealed weapon, MCL 750.227; MSA 28.424. Defendant specifically preserved for appeal a challenge that his gun did not come within the statutory definition of a "pistol” or "firearm.”

In entering his conditional guilty plea defendant read into the record the following statement:

On March 6th, 1987 in Kent County, Michigan at or about 10:30 p.m. a police officer grabbed my arm as I walked away from my wrecked car. A nine millimeter SWD Cobray that was totally inoperative and was not capable of propelling by the use of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. JiminezMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. People v. ClarkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. People v. CoffeyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. People v. WilliamsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  5. People v. CrousoreMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. PealsMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
  2. People v. BrownMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. People v. ThompsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. People v. ParrMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. People v. GardnerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API