Legal Opinion

Murray v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 21, 2000No. 99-1622PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Reversed and remanded by published opinion. Judge GOODWIN wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Senior Judge MINER joined.

OPINION

GOODWIN, District Judge:

This wrongful death action arises from the negligent medical services provided by Dr. James Hendricks, an agent of the McDonald Army Community Hospital, to Weston Murray, the plaintiffs deceased husband. The issue on appeal is whether the district court, in reaching a verdict for the plaintiff, Loretta Murray, correctly applied the concept of “substantial possibility of survival” to the element of proximate cause. We conclude that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Harry J. Hicks, Administrator of the Estate of Carol Greitens, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
  2. Brown v. KoulizakisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
  3. Hadeed v. Medic-24, Ltd.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1989
  4. Whitfield v. Whittaker Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Virginia · 1969
  5. Blondel v. HaysSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stickley v. ChisholmCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Murray v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
  3. Auer v. BakerNorfolk County Circuit Court · 2004
  4. C.R.M. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API