Legal Opinion
Bergdoll v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided September 16, 2004PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge LEADBETTER.
John G. Bergdoll, Gerald C. Grimaud and Matthew R. Battersby (petitioners), all residents and practicing attorneys in Pennsylvania, filed the present petition for review in our original jurisdiction. They seek a declaration voiding amendments to Article I, Section 9 (Face to Face Amend*190ment) and Article V, Section 10(c) (Judicial Administration Amendment) of the Pennsylvania Constitution passed by the electorate at the November 4, 2003 Municipal Election. The General Assembly filed preliminary objections challenging the jus-ticiability and the substantive merit, of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Maryland v. CraigSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Pacific States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Day v. Volkswagenwerk AktiengesellschaftSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- In Re DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Lewis v. Citibank, N.A.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Senator Jay Costa v. Sec. Pedro A. CortesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Sprague v. CortesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.