Legal Opinion

Corning Glass Works v. Ovsanik

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 29, 1993PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Determination unanimously annulled on the law without costs and petition granted. Memorandum: In this proceeding commenced pursuant to Executive Law § 298, petitioner, Corning Glass Works (Corning), contends that the determination of the Commissioner of the State Division of Human Rights (SDHR) should be annulled. Corning argues, inter alia, that it was denied due process when Commissioner Rosa, who appeared as General *960Counsel for SDHR in the early stages of the proceedings, issued the final order, and that excessive delay on the part of SDHR resulted in substantial prejudice to Corning. We…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Union Free School District No. 6 v. New York State Human Rights Appeal BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Sarkisian Bros. v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. General Motors Corporation—Delco Products Division v. RosaNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Alverson v. State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. State Division of Human Rights v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Corning Glass Works v. OvsanikNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Pepsico, Inc. v. RosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. New York State Department of Correctional Services v. State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. 935 Nicholas Renting Associates v. State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API