Legal Opinion
Pepsico, Inc. v. Rosa
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 20, 1995PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 to review a determination of the respondent Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human Rights, dated March 12, 1993, which, inter alia, found that the petitioner had unlawfully discriminated against the respondent Norman Ferrer and awarded him damages for back pay and mental anguish.
Adjudged that the petition is granted, on the law, with one bill of costs payable by the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs, and the determination of the respondent Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human Rights is annulled.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sarkisian Bros. v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- Corning Glass Works v. OvsanikNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- General Motors Corporation—Delco Products Division v. RosaNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Corning Glass Works v. OvsanikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by5 opinions
- Adler v. HooperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Springer v. Partners in CareDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1998
- Broome County Department of PubLic Transportation v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Ferrer v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1996
- Pat's Carpet Outlet, Inc. v. State of New York Executive DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997