People v. Santana
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge GABRIEL.
Defendant, Gonzalo Dalimiro Santana, was convicted by a jury of distribution of a controlled substance and was sentenced to four years of probation. We hold that the prose-ecution improperly suggested to the jury that defendant had an obligation to test the drugs at issue to determine whether they were crack cocaine, and thus placed a burden of proof on defendant. Because we cannot conclude that this suggestion was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt on the facts of this case, we reverse defendant's conviction and remand for a new trial.
I. Background
On January 10, 2007,…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- People v. StewartSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- State v. EasterWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. EasterWashington Supreme Court · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. SantanaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
- People v. TaylorColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- People v. PernellColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
- v. BurnellColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
- People v. SantanaColorado Court of Appeals · 2009