Herthel v. Dubbs
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GARRETT, Associate Judge.
This is an interference proceeding, arising in the United States Patent Office, between an application of the senior party, Dubbs, and a patent issued to the junior parties, Herthel and Tifft, which patent bears the broad title, “Art of Cracking Hydrocarbon Oils.” It is before us upon appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals affirming that of the Examiner- of Interferences awarding priority upon three counts to the party Dubbs, it being a judgment upon the record.
We are confronted at the outset with the insistence by Dubbs that, in view of the state of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Webster Electric Co. v. Splitdorf Electrical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- United States Ex. Rel. Lowry & Planters Compress Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Gowen v. HendryCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
- Lee v. VreelandCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1920
- Headley v. BridgesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Daley v. TrubeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937
- Hendrickson & Nelson v. Ronning & RonningCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
- Jany Renz, Jean Pierre Bourquin, Guido Gamboni and Gustav Schwarb v. Robert Michel Jacob and Gilbert Louis RegnierCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1996