Legal Opinion
United States v. Peter Albert Cimino
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided October 15, 1981No. 80-2319PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARZA, Circuit Judge:
Appellant, Peter Cimino, despite his limited involvement in a counterfeit scheme, plead guilty and received a sentence of five years; his co-defendants received probated sentences. Cimino attributes the court’s imposition of the sentence to reliance on factual inaccuracies in a presentence report prepared by the U.S. Probation Department. On appeal, Cimino contends that the sentencing judge violated appellant’s due process rights by considering the alleged inaccuracies. We disagree; the record fails to support Cimino’s allegations. Accordingly, we find that no error was…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gregg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Frank Hayes, Dorothy Foley Hayes and Alice BaldwinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Carlos MarcelloCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Eliseo Espinoza, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. LindellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. James Morrow Roper, Christian Matthew Newton, John Jackson Miller TruxellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. John Walter SparrowCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Reynaldo GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Eugene Wheeler, Freddie Strauder and George AllredCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.