Prisco v. Westgate Entertainment, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION TO DISQUALIFY COUNSEL
EGINTON, District Judge.
Defendant Westgate Entertainment [“Westgate”] moves, pursuant to Local Rules 3(a) and 33 and Rule 1.9 of the Model Rules of Professional Conduct, to disqualify the law firm of Slavitt, Connery & Vardamis [“Slavitt, Connery”] from representing or assisting the plaintiffs in this case. Motion papers reveal the following facts.
In August, 1987 a limited partnership named Titanic Ventures [the “Partnership”] was created to explore the wreck of the ocean liner Titanic and prepare a television program detailing the exploration. Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lasalle National Bank and Lake Properties Venture v. County of Lake and the Village of GrayslakeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Brennan's, Inc. v. Brennan's Restaurants, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- In Re Corn Derivatives Antitrust Litigation (Mdl 414). Appeal of John E. Koerner & Co., Inc., Imperial Products Corporation, and Pan-O-Gold, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Emle Industries, Inc. v. Patentex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Allegaert v. PerotCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SiskindCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- State Ex Rel. McClanahan v. HamiltonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
- Straub Clinic & Hospital v. KochiHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- Nelson v. Green Builders, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1993
- Colorpix Systems of America v. Broan Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.