Legal Opinion

Bruce v. Local 333, International Longshoremen's Ass'n

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided February 20, 2002No. Civ CCB-01-0138PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

BLAKE, District Judge.

Now pending before this Court are motions brought by defendants Local 333, International Longshoremen’s Association, AFL — CIO (“Local 333”), and Steamship Trade Association of Baltimore, Inc. (“STA”). Defendants move to dismiss the claims against them, or in the alternative, move for summary judgment. Because materials in the form of affidavits and exhibits thereto have been submitted by both sides, the motion will be treated as a motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Plaintiff Paul S.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Shaw v. StroudCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fonseca v. I.B.T. Teamsters Local Union 71District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2022
  2. Gyamerah v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of The Mid-Atlantic States, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2025
  3. McKenzie-El v. American Sugar Refinery, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API