Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Howard

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 29, 1977No. 1544PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBS, Judge:

Appellant and a co-defendant were convicted of attempted escape 1 from the State Correctional Institution at Grater-ford. Following the jury trial, post-trial motions were denied. This appeal followed, in which four issues are raised. Since we find these issues are without merit, we affirm.

The facts giving rise to the charges against appellant were summarized by the trial court as follows:

“ . . .At about 7:00 A.M. on August 26, 1975, Lieutenant Dietz was walking through the kitchen service corridor of the State Correctional Institution at Grater-ford when he observed two inmates…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HerronSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. BradshawSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. McCloskeySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. TarabildaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GoreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. HammSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. MayoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Commonwealth v. DessusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Commonwealth v. GilliamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API