Legal Opinion
Oiness v. Walgreen Company
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 2, 1996No. 95-1138Published
1Opinion of the Court
88 F.3d 1025
65 USLW 2080, 39 U.S.P.Q.2d 1304
Philip OINESS and Sun Products Group, Inc.,
Plaintiffs/Cross-Appellants,
v.
WALGREEN COMPANY, Atico International Incorporated, f/k/a/ J
& M Enterprises, d/b/a Atico New Atico
International, Ltd., d/b/a New Atico,
a/k/a Atico, Defendants-Appellants.
Nos. 95-1138, 95-1164, 95-1205.
United States Court of Appeals,
Federal Circuit.
July 2, 1996.
Donald R. Dunner, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, Washington, D.C., argued for defendants-appellants. With him on the brief was J. Michael Jakes. Of counsel was Barbara R. Rudolph. Also of counsel were…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rite-Hite Corp. v. Kelley Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Underwater Devices Incorporated v. Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc., Morrison-Knudsen Company, Inc. v. Lester A. Haug, Don W. Schmid and Herman GuntherCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company v. Johnson & Johnson Orthopaedics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.