Legal Opinion

Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. Cunningham

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1960No. 9138Published

1Opinion of the Court

10 Utah 2d 329 (1960)

353 P.2d 168

CONTINENTAL BANK & TRUST CO., PLAINTIFF AND RESPONDENT,

v.

CHARLES CUNNINGHAM AND WINFORD BUNCE, DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.

No. 9138.

Supreme Court of Utah.

June 9, 1960.

Harry E. Snow, Moab, Maxwell Bentley, Salt Lake City, for appellants.

Albert J. Colton and Kent Shearer (of Fabian & Clendenin), Salt Lake City, for respondent.

HENRIOD, Justice.

Appeal from summary judgment dismissing defendants' counterclaim. Affirmed. Costs to plaintiff.

Plaintiff sued on a note secured by a second mortgage, executed to obtain funds to improve defendants' motel property. The motel…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. CunninghamUtah Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API