Legal Opinion

Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. Cunningham

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1960No. 9138PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*331HENRIOD, Justice.

Appeal from summary judgment dismissing defendants’ counterclaim. Affirmed. Costs to plaintiff.

Plaintiff sued on a note secured by a second mortgage, executed to obtain funds to improve defendants’ motel property. The motel was encumbered by a first mortgage held by another bank.

The counterclaim historized financial difficulties incident to operation of the motel, and as to defendants’ inability to collect from their vendees on a time contract. The contract contained a provision to clear off encumbrances. The pleading then concluded that on January 8, 1958, plaintiff “entered…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Aird Insurance Agency v. Zions First National BankUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Gillmor v. CarterUtah Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Christensen v. Financial Service Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. CunninghamUtah Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API