Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Rhodes v. Simpson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 4, 1988No. 873SC1128PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Judge.

Though the State’s appeal is from an interlocutory order, it is authorized since the right not to have a case tried by a jury is a substantial right, no less than is the right to a jury trial. Fair-cloth v. Beard, 320 N.C. 505, 358 S.E. 2d 512 (1987). The only question it presents is whether the following guarantee:

In all controversies at law respecting property, the ancient mode of trial by jury is one of the best securities of the rights of the people, and shall remain sacred and inviolable.

contained in Section 25 of Article I of the North Carolina Constitution applies to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. In Re ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. North Carolina State Bar v. DuMontSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Belk's Department Store, Inc. v. . Guilford CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. Chowan & Southern Railroad v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Rhodes v. GaskillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. State ex rel. Rhodes v. GaskillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Lindenberg v. Jackson Nat'l Life Ins. Co.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API