Legal Opinion

Ginnery v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 1, 1993No. 18488Published

1Opinion of the Court

SHRUM, Judge.

The movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm.

In separate jury trials, the movant was convicted of rape in violation of § 566.030, RSMo 1978, and sodomy in violation of § 566.060, RSMo 1978. Pursuant to the juries’ recommendations he was sentenced to 13 years and 15 years respectively, the sentences to be served consecutively.

The movant’s convictions were affirmed by this court in State v. Ginnery, 617 S.W.2d 115 (Mo.App.1981), and State v. Ginnery, 617 S.W.2d 117 (Mo.App.1981). By separate motions, the movant sought…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. GinneryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. State v. GinneryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Ginnery v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Thomas v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Douglas v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API