Legal Opinion

Marx v. Goodnough

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 1888PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Union County.

1Opinion of the CourtStrahan, J.

This is a suit in equity, commenced by plaintiff against the defendant for an accounting in relation to the business and property of the partnership of W. S. Wines & Co., which firm consisted of W. S. Wines and H. B. Glover.

*27The amended complaint is, in substance, as follows: (1) That on or about the fourteenth day of October, 1884, at Island City, Union County, State of Oregon, the above-named defendants, H. B. Glover and W. S. Wines, entered into and formed a copartnership, under the firm name and style of W. S. Wines & Co., for the purpose of carrying on and conducting, on equal terms and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Goodenow v. EwerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Early & Wife v. FriendSupreme Court of Virginia · 1860
  3. Leach v. BeattieSupreme Court of Vermont · 1860
  4. Dyckman v. . ValienteNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  5. Wright v. WrightNew York Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kelly v. TracyOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Eilers Music House v. ReineOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Whyman v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917
  4. Davis v. TadevicCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. McKinnis v. DodgeOregon Supreme Court · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API